Summarize this blog post with:
The short answer: athenahealth's own scribe, athenaAmbient, is built into athenaOne at no additional cost. According to athenahealth, it captures the patient conversation and generates draft notes, potential diagnoses and recommended order types. Many practices should start there. Add a second tool only if a side-by-side test on your own visits shows a gap you can measure.
This is a change from two years ago, and most "best AI scribe for athenahealth" pages have not caught up. Here is the timeline from athenahealth's own announcements, and a way to decide.
How athenahealth's ambient tools developed
- 30 Oct 2024: Launch of Ambient Notes, embedded in the clinical workflow (athenahealth press release).
- Feb 2025: Partnership with Abridge (Business Wire).
- May 2025: General availability of Ambient Notes using Suki's technology (Business Wire).
- 4 Nov 2025: AI-native clinical encounter with chart prep, athenaAmbient and Sage chart search; athenaAmbient offered at no additional cost (Business Wire).
- Aug 2026: AI-native encounter and athenaAmbient available to more than 170,000 clinicians on the network (Business Wire).
What athenahealth says athenaAmbient does
- Notes: captures the conversation and generates a draft note, on desktop and mobile.
- Diagnoses and orders: drafts potential diagnoses and recommended order types; the Nov 2025 release also lists prescriptions.
- In-visit guidance: prompts for complete documentation and flags care gaps.
- Chart prep: patient summaries, "Changes since last visit" and "What to know today".
- Coding: the note is described as "ready for coding"; automated code assignment is not described.
- Early results (vendor-reported): nearly 6 fewer minutes per encounter on chart prep and documentation; more than 2 workdays saved per clinician per month; same-day chart completion up to 30%.
Notice what this means. Chart prep, orders and care gaps are things third-party tools also pitch. So "does it do X?" is the wrong question. The useful question is how well it does X on your visits.
A 10-visit side-by-side test
Pick one clinician, ten typical visits, and score each tool on the same encounters:
- Edit rate: how much of the draft did the clinician change?
- Time to sign: minutes from end of visit to signature.
- Diagnosis accuracy: match to what the clinician finally signed.
- Order accuracy: wrong, missing or duplicate orders.
- Template fit: does the note follow the specialty template without rework?
- After the visit: was the referral booked and the care gap closed, or just listed?
The last item is where tools tend to differ most, because a draft note is a smaller job than getting the follow-up done. For a longer before-and-after method, see do AI scribes save time.
Where SteerNotes fits
The SteerNotes page describes Steer's AI clinical documentation product: it works inside the EHR workflow, drafts in your templates, and requires the clinician's signature before anything is final. Steer also exhibited at athenahealth's Thrive 2026. If you test SteerNotes, use the same ten visits and the same scorecard, so the comparison stays fair.
Next step
Bring ten of your own visits and compare. Book a SteerNotes demo.




